Monday, 25 March 2013

DECLARATION OF PLEBISCITE BY THE UNITED NATIONS FOR STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR ON JANUARY 5, 1949: HABIB YOUSAFZAI, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


DECLARATION OF PLEBISCITE BY THE UNITED NATIONS FOR STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR ON JANUARY 5, 1949: 
HABIB YOUSAFZAI, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


The United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan, Having received from the Governments of India and Pakistan, in communications dated 23 December and 25 December 1948, respectively, their acceptance of the following principles which are supplementary to the Commission's Resolution of 13 August 1948:

1. The question of the accession of the State of Jammu and Kashmir to India or Pakistan will be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite;

2. A plebiscite will be held when it shall be found by the Commission that the cease-fire and truce arrangements set forth in Parts I and II of the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948 have been carried out and arrangements for the plebiscite have been completed;

3. 
(a) The Secretary-General of the United Nations will, in agreement with the Commission, nominate a Plebiscite Administrator who shall be a personality of high international standing and commanding general confidence. He will be formally appointed to office by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir.

(b) The Plebiscite Administrator shall derive from the State of Jammu and Kashmir the powers he considers necessary for organizing and conducting the plebiscite and for ensuring the freedom and impartiality of the plebiscite.

(c) The Plebiscite Administrator shall have authority to appoint such staff of assistants and observes as he may require.

4. 
(a) After implementation of Parts I and II of the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948, and when the Commission is satisfied that peaceful conditions have been restored in the State, the Commission and the Plebiscite Administrator will determine, in consultation with the Government of India, the final disposal of Indian and State armed forces, such disposal to be with due regard to the security of the State and the freedom of the plebiscite.

(b) As regards the territory referred to in A.2 of Part II of the resolution of 13 August, final disposal of the armed forces in that territory will be determined by the Commission and the Plebiscite Administrator in consultation with the local authorities.

5. All civil and military authorities within the State and the principal political elements of the State will be required to co-operate with the Plebiscite Administrator in the preparation for the holding of the plebiscite.

6. 
(a) All citizens of the State who have left it on account of the disturbances will be invited and be free to return and to exercise all their rights as such citizens. For the purpose of facilitating repatriation there shall be appointed two Commissions, one composed of nominees of India and the other of nominees of Pakistan. The Commission shall operate under the direction of the Plebiscite Administrator. The Governments of India and Pakistan and all authorities within the State of Jammu and Kashmir will collaborate with the Plebiscite Administrator in putting this provision into effect.

(b) All person (other than citizens of the State) who on or since 15 August 1947 have entered it for other than lawful purpose, shall be required to leave the State.

7. All authorities within the State of Jammu and Kashmir will undertake to ensure, in collaboration with the Plebiscite Administrator, that:

(a) There is no threat, coercion or intimidation, bribery or other undue influence on the voters in the plebiscite;

(b) No restrictions are placed on legitimate political activity throughout the State. All subjects of the State, regardless of creed, caste or party, shall be safe and free in expressing their views and in voting on the question of the accession of the State to India or Pakistan. There shall be freedom of the press, speech and assembly and freedom of travel in the State, including freedom of lawful entry and exit;

(c) All political prisoners are released;

(d) Minorities in all parts of the State are accorded adequate protection; and

(e) There is no victimization.

8. The Plebiscite Administrator may refer to the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan problems on which he may require assistance, and the Commission may in its discretion call upon the Plebiscite Administrator to carry out on its behalf any of the responsibilities with which it has been entrusted;

9. At the conclusion of the plebiscite, the Plebiscite Administrator shall report the result thereof to the Commission and to the Government of Jammu and Kashmir. The Commission shall then certify to the Security Council whether the plebiscite has or has not been free and impartial;

10. Upon the signature of the truce agreement the details of the foregoing proposals will be elaborated in the consultations envisaged in Part III of the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948. The Plebiscite Administrator will be fully associated in these consultations;

Commends the Governments of India and Pakistan for their prompt action in ordering a cease-fire to take effect from one minute before midnight of 1 January 1949, pursuant to the agreement arrived at as provided for by the Commission's Resolution of 13 August 1948; and

Resolves to return in the immediate future to the Sub-continent to discharge the responsibilities imposed upon it by the Resolution of 13 August 1948 and by the foregoing principles.

KASHMIRI AND SIKH PROTEST AGAINST THE ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF MAQBOOZA KASHMIR [AKA INTERNATIONALLY DISPUTED AREAS OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR (IDA: JK)] BY THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT: HABIB YOUSAFZAI, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


KASHMIRI AND SIKH PROTEST AGAINST THE ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF MAQBOOZA KASHMIR [AKA INTERNATIONALLY DISPUTED AREAS OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 
(IDA: JK)] BY THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT: 
HABIB YOUSAFZAI, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


Kashmiri Sikh Struggle against the Indian Army Occupation

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUtCEW_3cc4&feature=related

Saturday, 23 March 2013

ISLAM CANNOT BE ADEQUATELY PRACTICED IN MAQBOOZA KASHMIR (IDA: JK) UNDER THE SLAVERY OF PREDOMINANTLY HINDU INDIA: HABIB YOUSAFZAI, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE

ISLAM CANNOT BE ADEQUATELY PRACTICED IN MAQBOOZA KASHMIR (IDA: JK) UNDER THE SLAVERY OF PREDOMINANTLY HINDU INDIA: 

HABIB YOUSAFZAI, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


Maqbooza Kashmir [AKA Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir (IDA:JK)] was forcefully occupied by the Indian government on October 27, 1947 under the pretext of maintaining law and order. There has not been one day which has passed in which in order to maintain its occupation the Indian government has not suppressed the voices of freedom and committed human rights violations.  All key jobs such holding the degree of IPS, ICS, IAS from all over India has been awarded key jobs in the occupied territory instead of hiring from the local community. Hindus are being encourage to settle in Maqbooza Kashmir in order to alter the demographics of the area. People are imprisoned in their own homes; they cannot even say their five daily prayers at the mosque. Therefore, under circumstances of oppression and discrimination, it is impossible for Kashmiris to practice their religion while it is occupied by India. 

PRESS RELEASE: 21 MARCH 2013 

While felicitating and greeting the people and establishment of Pakistan from the core of the heart Chairman Islamic Political Party (JK) Mr. Mohammad Yousuf Naqash prayed for its security ,stability and prosperity and hoped to see it emerge as most powerful and truly Islamic. Mr.Naqash further said that Kashmiri people have highest regard for Pakistan and extend warm  gratitude for its unflinching moral, political and diplomatic support to the Kashmir cause and hope that Pakistan will continue its support to the oppressed and tormented Kashmiri people in securing their inalienable right to self determination in accordance with the united nations charter on the principle of right to self determination and will neither show any flexibility in this regard nor allow anyone to detract from the principled stand. Mr.Naqash while strongly condemning the brutal oppression of Kashmiri people at the hands of more than 700,000 Indian forces has said that India and its state puppet administration will never   succeed  in suppressing the ongoing  freedom struggle and by the blessings of ALLAH ALMIGHTY Kashmir will very soon achieve freedom for Islam.

Press Secretary



Malik Shabir


ISLAMIC POLITICAL PARTY (JK)
ALL PARTIES HURRIYAT CONFERENCE

KURSU RAJBAGH SRINAGAR, JAMMU AND KASHMIR

(ILLEGALLY OCCUPIED)



Friday, 22 March 2013

70 MILLION PEOPLE LIVE IN DESTITUTE POVERTY IN SLUMS WITHIN INDIA YET THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT IS SPENDING BILLIONS IN THE OCCUPATION OF THE SIKH HOMELAND OF PUNJAB KHALISTAN AND MAQBOOZA KASHMIR (IDA:JK): HABIB YOUSAFZAI KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


70 MILLION PEOPLE LIVE IN DESTITUTE POVERTY IN SLUMS WITHIN INDIA YET THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT IS SPENDING BILLIONS IN THE OCCUPATION OF THE SIKH HOMELAND OF PUNJAB KHALISTAN AND MAQBOOZA KASHMIR (IDA:JK): 
HABIB YOUSAFZAI KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE



68 million Indians living in slums

NEW DELHI: Approximately 68 million Indians are living in slums, according to a government census. 

Releasing the first such census report on slum households prepared by the Registrar General of India, Union Housing and urban poverty alleviation minister Ajay Maken today said that majority of them were located in Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. 

Presenting the highlights of the report, Census Commissioner C Chandramouli said, "In all 1.73 crore census houses have been reported in houselisting blocks, categorised as slums in India, comprising 1.37 crore slum households." 

He also noted that in 19 cities with million-plus population, 25 per cent of households live in slums

"A majority-71 per cent- of these are located in six states of Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, west Bengal, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh," Chandramouli said. 

90 per cent of slum households use electricity, 70 per cent slum households have television, 72.7 per cent have telephone facility while 10.4 per cent households have computer or laptop in their house. 

Maken said, "In 2001, there were 23.5 per cent of households in urban areas which were living in slums. It has now come down to 17.4 per cent. But there are still 17.35 million slum houses, 13.74 million slum households and we have 68 million people living in the slum areas as 2011 census." 

The slum household census report says that 74 per cent of these households use tap as the main source of drinking water followed by hand pump ortube which is used by 20.3 per cent. 

66 per cent households have toilet facility within the premises, but 18.9 per cent slum households defecate in open and 15.1 per cent use public facilities, according to the report on 'Housing Stock, Amenities And Assets in Slums Based on House Listing And Housing Census'. 

Ten places in the country also claimed to be 'all-slum towns'.



Thursday, 21 March 2013

SYED ALI SHAH GEELANI THE CHAIRMAN OF HURRIYAT SAID IT IS A TESTING TIME FOR PAKISTAN AS INDIA HAS CROSSED ALL LIMITS IN COMMITTING ATROCITIES IN MAQBOOZA KASHMIR. FORCES ARE NOT JUST INDISCRIMINATELY KILLING, BUT ARE TAKING PART IN HOME INVASIONS AND BEATING WOMEN. THEREFORE, PAKISTAN MUST DEMAND A PLEBISCITE FOR THE OCCUPIED TERRITORY


SYED ALI SHAH GEELANI THE CHAIRMAN OF HURRIYAT SAID IT IS A TESTING TIME FOR PAKISTAN AS INDIA HAS CROSSED ALL LIMITS IN COMMITTING ATROCITIES IN MAQBOOZA KASHMIR. FORCES ARE NOT JUST INDISCRIMINATELY KILLING, BUT ARE TAKING PART IN HOME INVASIONS AND BEATING WOMEN. 
THEREFORE, PAKISTAN MUST DEMAND A PLEBISCITE FOR THE OCCUPIED TERRITORY


Separatists get invite for Pak Day function

Hurriyat (G), JKLF In Waiting

ABID BASHIR

Srinagar, Mar 17: Even as Hurriyat Conference led by Syed Ali Geelani and JKLF headed by Yasin Malik have not received formal invitations for attending the ‘Pakistan Day’ function on March 23 in New Delhi, the Hurriyat led by Mirwaiz Umar Farooq would send a delegation to apprise the Pakistan High Commissioner about situation that has emerged after the execution of Muhammad Afzal Guru in Kashmir. The separatist leaders have decided to urge Pakistan to redouble its efforts towards settlement of the Kashmir issue.

Almost all members of the Hurriyat (M) have received the invitation from Pakistan High Commissioner for attending the ‘Pakistan Day.’ However, this time around, the separatists have been invited on March 22 instead of March 23 in New Delhi.  Sources said the Pakistan HC would host dinner for the guests, including separatist leaders from the Valley, on March 22. However, the Hurriyat (M) leaders have decided to skip the banquet following the “spurt in human rights violation in the Valley.” 
 
Talking to Greater Kashmir over phone, Mirwaiz, who is currently under house arrest, said it seems difficult for him to visit New Delhi at this juncture as situation is fragile in Kashmir. “I would prefer to stay with the people. We will be sending a delegation to New Delhi to attend the Pakistan day function,” he said.

The Mirwaiz said during the meeting between Hurriyat delegation and the Pakistan High Commissioner on the sidelines of the function, the members from the amalgam would apprise the Pakistan leaders about the fallout of the post-Afzal execution in Kashmir. “We will also urge the Pakistan High Commissioner to re-double the efforts towards Kashmir resolution. Our delegations will also brief Pakistan leadership about the spurt in the human rights violations in Kashmir,” the Hurriyat (M) chairman said. “The Hurriyat members will also thank the Pakistan leaders for passing a resolution against Afzal’s hanging in Pakistan Parliament.” Sources said the Hurriyat (M) delegation would be headed by Aga Syed Al Hassan.

Surprisingly, the Hurriyat led by Geelani has not received the formal invite so far. “We haven’t received any invitation regarding Pakistan Day function in New Delhi,” Geelani said. “But I want to convey my message to the entire Pakistani leadership that it is high time to treat Kashmir as a core issue and to mobilize all channels within Pakistan and all other countries so that a pressure is build on India to hold plebiscite in Kashmir.” The aged leader said it is a testing time for Pakistan as “India has crossed all limits of committing atrocities in Kashmir. Forces are not just on the killing spree, but barging into the residential houses and beating women folk as well.” 
 
Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front led by Muhammad Yasin Malik hasn’t received the invitation as yet. “We haven’t received any invitation from Pakistan High Commissioner,” said a JKLF spokesman. However, JKLF (H) chairman Javaid Ahmed Mir has received the invitation. “I will go and cash in on the opportunity. I will try to meet the Pakistan High Commissioner separately and brief him about the prevailing situation in Kashmir. I will make a point that trade is not solution to the vexed Kashmir issue, but there is a need to show a more realistic approach on Kashmir by Pakistan,” Mir said.

http://www.greaterkashmir.com/news/2013/Mar/18/separatists-get-invite-for-pak-day-function-60.asp


Wednesday, 20 March 2013

ITS ALL ABOUT AAZADI (INDEPENDENCE) OF MAQBOOZA KASHMIR UNDER ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF INDIAN GOVERNMENT SINCE OCTOBER 27, 1947


ITS ALL ABOUT AAZADI (INDEPENDENCE) OF MAQBOOZA KASHMIR UNDER ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF INDIAN GOVERNMENT SINCE OCTOBER 27, 1947

http://kashmirdiasporaa.blogspot.com/2013/03/its-all-about-aazadi-independence-of.html





Monday, 18 March 2013

A NEW INTIFADA IN KASHMIR? ARUNDHATI ROY & SANJAY KAK ON THE WORLD’S MOST DENSELY MILITARIZED AREA


A NEW INTIFADA IN KASHMIR? ARUNDHATI ROY & SANJAY KAK ON THE WORLD’S MOST DENSELY MILITARIZED AREA



A New Intifada in Kashmir? Arundhati Roy & Sanjay Kak on the World’s Most Densely Militarized Area

We continue our conversation with acclaimed author Arundhati Roy by discussing the overlooked conflict in Kashmir, the center of a decades-long dispute between India and Pakistan. Roy joins us along with Sanjay Kak, a New Delhi-based documentary filmmaker whose most recent film is "Jashn-e-Azadi," or "How We Celebrate Freedom," and who is the author of the book, "Until My Freedom Has Come: The New Intifada in Kashmir." Discussing India’s military involvement in Kashmir, Roy says: "It’s such a morally reprehensible thing to be living in a country that is doing this to a people and everyone is keeping quiet about it. ... What they are doing to people is terrible." [includes rush transcript]

TRANSCRIPT

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: As we continue our conversation with the author and activist Arundhati Roy, she is now joined in Chicago by Sanjay Kak, a New Delhi-based documentary filmmaker. His most recent film is Jashn-e-Azadi, or How We Celebrate Freedom. He’s the author of Until My Freedom Has Come: The New Intifada in Kashmir.

We welcome you in joining Arundhati in this discussion. Can you talk about, Arundhati first, the lay of the land, why you have become so interested in this issue, and why you’re traveling to the United States to speak about it?

ARUNDHATI ROY: No, it is—well, I suppose if one were to explain the situation in the simplest possible terms, the struggle for self-determination in Kashmir began in 1947, at the time of India’s independence and the partition of India and Pakistan. And Kashmir, which used to be an independent kingdom, was more or less torn apart during partition, half occupied by Pakistan and the other half occupied by India. And it is a country with a—I mean, it’s a state with a predominantly Muslim population, but had a Hindu ruler, who was supposed to have acceded to India, though there was supposed to be a plebiscite after 1947, which never took place.
And today Kashmir is the most densely militarized zone in the world. India has something like 700,000 security forces there. And in the '90s, early ’90s, the fight became—turned into an armed struggle, and since then, something like 68,000 people have died, maybe 100,000 tortured, 10,000 disappeared, you know? I mean, we all talk a lot about Chile, Pinochet. These numbers are far greater. And this is just the crude end of it, you know? Can you imagine living in a place where there are so many soldiers, you can't—you go out of your door, you come out, come to a barrier. Every aspect of life, whether it’s joyous or otherwise, is sort of diverted through the military.
And it’s become a very ugly—an ugly stain on people who would like to be—have some self-respect. And I’m talking about Indians, you know, I’m talking about somebody like myself, that it makes me feel that it’s such a morally reprehensible thing to be living in a country that is doing this to a people and keeping—everyone is keeping quiet about it. There are very, very few people in India who would say anything about this. I mean, we hear about conscientious objectors in Iraq, in Vietnam, but in India there has never, ever been a conscientious objector in the army. And what they are doing to people is terrible.

AMY GOODMAN: Sanjay Kak, you have written Until My Freedom Has Come: The New Intifada in Kashmir. Why describe it in that way? And what do you feel an international audience needs to understand now about Kashmir?
SANJAY KAK: You know, since 1990, Kashmir has been sort of characterized as this place which is riven with armed conflict. And in a sense, that has been the dominating sort of aspect of what has been going on there. And it’s only from around 2008 that there was a kind of paradigm shift in terms of what was going on there. You could argue that the armed militancy had been broken or that that society decided that the armed struggle was not the only way in which it could proceed further, but we began to sense something happening in 2008, which is when, after decades, hundreds and thousands of people began coming out on the streets. And this happened in 2008. It happened in 2009. And 2010 was sort of almost cataclysmic in terms of the change that we saw on the streets. Of course, it meant that the security forces came out, and more than 120 young men were killed on the streets, armed with nothing more than rocks, but it was a moment which was also accompanied by a explosion in writing about Kashmir. And it was obvious to all of us that the sort of the stone throwing on the street, the intifada of the street, was accompanied by an intifada of the mind, you know, a sort of a churning, a release.
And this book, Until My Freedom Has Come, actually seeks to—not to commemorate, but to draw attention to the fact that something very, very significant has happened in Kashmir. And I think while you might be able to curb the young men on the street, you might be able to increase the number of soldiers from 600,000 to 800,000, but once people make that switch in their heads, you know, once the intifada of the mind is operational, then I think it’s a fantastic moment, because it’s a very liberatory moment. And the book seeks to mark that moment of liberation.
AMY GOODMAN: How does what happens in Kashmir affect what happens in India, in Pakistan, in Afghanistan, Sanjay?
SANJAY KAK: It’s totally locked in. I mean, if you were to just see what impact what’s happening in Kashmir has on the body of the Indian republic, I think it’s extremely important, firstly because right from 1947, when India came into being, Kashmir has been the kind of symbolic heart, or the head, actually, the crown around which Indian self-identity is tied up—and, of course, the middle opposite in Pakistan. So if, for Indians, Kashmir represents the triumph of Indian secularism, where a Muslim-majority province becomes part of India, then, for Pakistan, the very same act becomes a failure, because here is a Muslim—a country built as a safe haven for Muslims, which cannot hold onto a Muslim-majority province. So there is a kind of semiotic, very heavy weight attached to Kashmir, but that’s not the only thing. I think that, you know, for the last 25 years, we’ve seen the most horrendous deployment of the army and the most retrogressive and undemocratic sets of laws—the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, the Public Safety Act. So, in a sense, it’s really—
AMY GOODMAN: We have five seconds.
SANJAY KAK: It’s the end of—if you want to look at Kashmir, you can see the end of democracy in what’s happening in Kashmir.
AMY GOODMAN: We’re going to do part two online at democracynow.org. Sanjay Kak, filmmaker, author, Until My Freedom Has Come: The New Intifada in Kashmir. And the great writer, Arundhati Roy.
http://www.democracynow.org/seo/2013/3/18/a_new_intifada_in_kashmir_arundhati


Sunday, 17 March 2013

BEAUTIFUL ZIKAR GATHERING OF SAIFI SILSILA


BEAUTIFUL ZIKAR GATHERING OF SAIFI SILSILA


Beautiful Zikar Gathering of Saifi Silsila


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbxHOz8mVas&feature=share

WE NEED TO CONTINUE TO SPREAD UNCONDITIONAL LOVE, PEACE, AND TOLERANCE AMONGST ALL HUMAN BEINGS: HABIB YOUSAFZAI KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


WE NEED TO CONTINUE TO SPREAD UNCONDITIONAL LOVE, PEACE, AND TOLERANCE AMONGST ALL HUMAN BEINGS: HABIB YOUSAFZAI 
KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE

http://kashmirdiasporaa.blogspot.com/2013/03/we-need-to-continue-to-spread.html

ASSALAM-O-ALAIKUM!

When the devil (Satan) was granted respite by Almighty God (Allah) until the day of resurrection, he promised that he would lie wait on the straight path and attack those walking firmly on it from every corner. Furthermore, he said that most of the children of Adam he would succeed in leading astray with the exception of a few chosen slaves of God. God has openly warned humankind to be aware of Satan’s plots for he only wishes to spread dissent, hatred, grudges, and animosity between human beings. In this light, we cannot fall into the devil’s plan; we need to continue to spread unconditional love, peace, and tolerance amongst all human beings.  

PLEBISCITE UNDER THE AUSPICIOUS OF UNITED NATION IS THE ONLY SOLUTION FOR MAQBOOZA KASHMIR (IDA: JK)


PLEBISCITE UNDER THE AUSPICIOUS OF UNITED NATION IS THE ONLY SOLUTION FOR MAQBOOZA KASHMIR (IDA: JK)


PRESS RELEASE:MARCH 16, 2013
Chairman Islamic Political Party (JK) Mr.Mohammad Yousuf Naqash has hailed and welcomed the resolution unanimously passed by AJK assembly and Kashmir council put forth by the prime minister of AJK Mr. Choudhary Abdul Majeed and supported by opposition leader Mr.Farooq Haider for expressing solidarity with the tormented and subjugated people of Indian occupied Kashmir and seeking their inalienable right to self determination and the return of mortal remains of great martyrs Shaheed Mohammad Maqbool Bhat and Shaheed Afzal Guru. He expressed gratitude on behalf of Kashmiri people to them including the head of Pakistan Kashmir Committee Maulana Fazl –ul- Rehman. Mr.Naqash further said that although the worry and concern of United Nations Secretary General Mr. Banki Moon on Kashmir violence is justified and that Kashmiri people are never in favor and support of violence and have always stressed for lasting solution of Kashmir dispute through civilized political and diplomatic efforts in accordance with the United Nations Charter on Right to Self Determination and still believe in the civilized peaceful method. Tormented Kashmiri people have also the right to express their concern and worry about the silence of Mr. Banki Moon on the continuous brutal oppression of Kashmiri people at the hands of Indian forces for raising their peaceful voice  for their inalienable Right to Self Determination acknowledged by World Apex Body United Nations Organization and are also justified to put forth their concern and worry in this regard to ask Mr. Banki Moon that why he broke his silence and expressed concern on Kashmir violence post suicide attack? Why is it so? Or is it the value of Kashmiri human beings and standard of International Rules in so far as Kashmir is concerned?

Press Secretary




Malik Shabir


ISLAMIC POLITICAL PARTY (JK)
ALL PARTIES HURRIYAT CONFERENCE
KURSU RAJBAGH SRINAGAR, JAMMU AND KASHMIR

(ILLEGALLY OCCUPIED)

A PERFECT DAY FOR DEMOCRACY BY ARUNDHATI ROY


Wasn’t it? Yesterday I mean. Spring announced itself in Delhi. The sun was out, and the Law took its Course. Just before breakfast, Afzal Guru, prime accused in the 2001 Parliament Attack was secretly hanged, and his body was interred in Tihar Jail. Was he buried next to Maqbool Butt? (The other Kashmiri who was hanged in Tihar in 1984. Kashmiris will mark that anniversary tomorrow.) Afzal’s wife and son were not informed. “The Authorities intimated the family through Speed Post and Registered Post,” the Home Secretary told the press, “the Director General of J&K Police has been told to check whether they got it or not.” No big deal, they’re only the family of a Kashmiri terrorist.

In a moment of rare unity the Nation, or at least its major political parties, the Congress, the BJP and the CPM came together as one (barring a few squabbles about ‘delay’ and ‘timing’) to celebrate the triumph of the Rule of Law. The Conscience of the Nation, which broadcasts live from TV studios these days, unleashed its collective intellect on us — the usual cocktail of papal passion and a delicate grip on facts. Even though the man was dead and gone, like cowards that hunt in packs, they seemed to need each other to keep their courage up. Perhaps because deep inside themselves they know that they all colluded to do something terribly wrong.

What are the facts?
On the 13th of December 2001 five armed men drove through the gates of the Parliament House in a white Ambassador fitted out with an Improvised Explosive Device. When they were challenged they jumped out of the car and opened fire. They killed eight security personnel and a gardener. In the gun battle that followed, all five attackers were killed. In one of the many versions of confessions he made in police custody, Afzal Guru identified the men as Mohammed, Rana, Raja, Hamza and Haider. That’s all we know about them even today. L.K. Advani, the then Home Minister, said they ‘looked like Pakistanis.’ (He should know what Pakistanis look like right? Being a Sindhi himself.) Based only on Afzal’s confession (which the Supreme Court subsequently set aside citing ‘lapses’ and ‘violations of procedural safeguards’) the Government of India recalled its Ambassador from Pakistan and mobilised half a million soldiers to the Pakistan border. There was talk of nuclear war. Foreign embassies issued Travel Advisories and evacuated their staff from Delhi. The standoff lasted for months and cost India thousands of crores.

On the 14th of December 2001 the Delhi Police Special Cell claimed it had cracked the case. On the 15th of December it arrested the ‘master mind’ Professor S.A.R Geelani in Delhi and Showkat Guru and Afzal Guru in a fruit market in Srinagar. Subsequently they arrested Afsan Guru, Showkat’s wife. The media enthusiastically disseminated the Special Cell’s version. These were some of the headlines: ‘DU Lecturer was Terror Plan Hub’, ‘Varsity Don Guided Fidayeen’, ‘Don Lectured on Terror in Free Time.’ Zee TV broadcast a ‘docudrama’ called December 13th , a recreation that claimed to be the ‘Truth Based on the Police Charge Sheet.’ (If the police version is the truth, then why have courts?) Then Prime Minister Vajpayee and L.K. Advani publicly appreciated the film. The Supreme Court refused to stay the screening saying that the media would not influence judges. The film was broadcast only a few days before the fast track court sentenced Afzal, Showkat and Geelani to death. Subsequently the High Court acquitted the ‘mastermind’, Professor S.A.R Geelani, and Afsan Guru. The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal. But in its 5th August 2005 judgment it gave Mohammed Afzal three life sentences and a double death sentence.

Contrary to the lies that have been put about by some senior journalists who would have known better, Afzal Guru was not one of “the terrorists who stormed Parliament House on December 13th 2001” nor was he among those who “opened fire on security personnel, apparently killing three of the six who died.” (That was the BJP Rajya Sabha MP, Chandan Mitra, in The Pioneer, October 7th 2006). Even the police charge sheet does not accuse him of that. The Supreme Court judgment says the evidence is circumstantial: “As is the case with most conspiracies, there is and could be no direct evidence amounting to criminal conspiracy.” But then it goes on to say: “The incident, which resulted in heavy casualties had shaken the entire nation, and the collective conscience of society will only be satisfied if capital punishment is awarded to the offender.”
Who crafted our collective conscience on the Parliament Attack case? Could it have been the facts we gleaned from the papers? The films we saw on TV?There are those who will argue that the very fact that the courts acquitted S.A.R Geelani and convicted Afzal proves that the trial was free and fair. Was it?

The trial in the fast-track court began in May 2002. The world was still convulsed by post 9/11 frenzy. The US government was gloating prematurely over its ‘victory’ in Afghanistan. The Gujarat pogrom was ongoing. And in the Parliament Attack case, the Law was indeed taking its own course. At the most crucial stage of a criminal case, when evidence is presented, when witnesses are cross-examined, when the foundations of the argument are laid — in the High Court and the Supreme Court you can only argue points of law, you cannot introduce new evidence — Afzal Guru, locked in a high security solitary cell, had no lawyer. The court-appointed junior lawyer did not visit his client even once in jail, he did not summon any witnesses in Afzal’s defence and did not cross examine the prosecution witnesses. The judge expressed his inability to do anything about the situation.

Even still, from the word go, the case fell apart. A few examples out of many: How did the police get to Afzal? They said that S.A.R Geelani led them to him. But the court records show that the message to arrest Afzal went out before they picked up Geelani. The High Court called this a ‘material contradiction’ but left it at that.

The two most incriminating pieces of evidence against Afzal were a cellphone and a laptop confiscated at the time of arrest. The Arrest Memos were signed by Bismillah, Geelani’s brother, in Delhi. The Seizure Memos were signed by two men of the J&K Police, one of them an old tormentor from Afzal’s past as a surrendered ‘militant’. The computer and cellphone were not sealed, as evidence is required to be. During the trial it emerged that the hard disc of the laptop had been accessed after the arrest. It only contained the fake home ministry passes and the fake identity cards that the terrorists used to access Parliament. And a Zee TV video clip of Parliament House. So according to the police, Afzal had deleted all the information except the most incriminating bits, and he was speeding off to hand it over to Ghazi Baba, who the charge sheet described as the Chief of Operations.

A witness for the prosecution, Kamal Kishore, identified Afzal and told the court he had sold him the crucial SIM card that connected all the accused in the case to each other on the 4th of December 2001. But the prosecution’s own call records showed that the SIM was actually operational from November 6th 2001.
It goes on and on, this pile up of lies and fabricated evidence. The courts note them, but for their pains the police get no more than a gentle rap on their knuckles. Nothing more.

Then there’s the back story. Like most surrendered militants Afzal was easy meat in Kashmir — a victim of torture, blackmail, extortion. In the larger scheme of things he was a nobody. Anyone who was really interested in solving the mystery of the Parliament Attack would have followed the dense trail of evidence that was on offer. No one did, thereby ensuring that the real authors of conspiracy will remain unidentified and uninvestigated.

But now that Afzal Guru has been hanged, I hope our collective conscience has been satisfied. Or is our cup of blood still only half full?

Saturday, 16 March 2013

THE INHABITANTS OF MAQBOOZA KASHMIR [AKA INTERNATIONALLY DISPUTED AREAS OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR (IDA: JK)] ARE LEGAL CITIZENS OF PAKISTAN. THEREFORE, PAKISTAN HAS A MORAL, LEGAL, AND CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY TO LIBERATE THEM FROM INDIAN OCCUPATION: HABIB YOUSAFZAI, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


THE INHABITANTS OF MAQBOOZA KASHMIR [AKA INTERNATIONALLY DISPUTED AREAS OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR (IDA: JK)] ARE LEGAL CITIZENS OF PAKISTAN. THEREFORE, PAKISTAN HAS A MORAL, LEGAL, AND CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY TO LIBERATE THEM FROM INDIAN OCCUPATION: 
HABIB YOUSAFZAI, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


PRESS RELEASE: MARCH 15, 2013

Chairman Islamic Political Party (JK) Mr. Mohammad Yousuf Naqash has said that the passing of resolution by the National Assembly of Pakistan in respect of internationally recognized Kashmir dispute is a welcome, highly appreciating, encouraging and appropriate step towards the right direction.  Pakistan being the most important party to the Kashmir dispute besides most importantly the well wisher of Kashmiri people has once again reiterated its commitment of moral, political and diplomatic support to the ongoing freedom struggle of Kashmiri people and high regard to Kashmiri martyrs by unequivocally, sincerely and seriously stressing for the lasting and just solution of Kashmir dispute in accordance with the United Nations Charter on Right to Self Determination besides strongly condemning the hanging of  Shaheed Afzal Guru( monument of freedom) return of his body, end to killings, revocation of draconian laws and release of prisoners. Mr.Naqash further said that Kashmir was, is and will remain the core concern for the governments and people of Pakistan given the fact both have deep rooted emotional and religious affinities and India will never succeed in downplaying  the freedom sentiment of Kashmiri people and their emotional and religious attachment by its false and unethical rhetoric and biased media hype and misleading propaganda. Mr.Naqash has strongly condemned slapping draconian public safety act on the prominent pro freedom leader and chairman democratic freedom party Mr.Shabir Ahmad Shah and sending him to Kot Balwal jail Jammu in spite of his various ailments and deteriorating health. He warned that occupation authorities are playing with his life and it is unacceptable to the kashmiri people.

Press Secretary



Malik Shabir


ISLAMIC POLITICAL PARTY (JK)
ALL PARTIES HURRIYAT CONFERENCE

KURSU RAJBAGH SRINAGAR, JAMMU AND KASHMIR

(ILLEGALLY OCCUPIED)


Thursday, 14 March 2013

OVER 98% OF MUSLIMS FROM MAQBOOZA KASHMIR WISH TO JOIN PAKISTAN WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER THE OCCUPATION OF THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT SINCE OCTOBER 27, 1947 WHEREAS 99.99% OF PEOPLE OF AZAD KASHMIR ASSERT THAT THEIR MERGER WITH PAKISTAN WAS A GREAT STEP: HABIB YOUSAFZAI, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


OVER 98% OF MUSLIMS FROM MAQBOOZA KASHMIR WISH TO JOIN PAKISTAN WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER THE OCCUPATION OF THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT SINCE OCTOBER 27, 1947 WHEREAS 99.99% OF PEOPLE OF AZAD KASHMIR ASSERT THAT THEIR MERGER WITH PAKISTAN WAS A GREAT STEP: 
HABIB YOUSAFZAI, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


ASSALAM-O-ALAIKUM!

While the Hindu majority of India has been aggressively pursuing super power status in the international system, it is deplorable to come to grips with the notion that Muslims are simultaneously reverting back to a time prior to the inception of Islam, the age of ignorance attempting to adopt the tribal system once again ? Maqbooza Kashmir’s unification with Pakistan is the real definition of freedom; not as a subordinated, separate and fragmented state unable to survive in an international system of self interested nations. By the grace of Allah Almighty God (SWT), more than 98% of Muslims from Maqbooza Kashmir want to join Pakistan. 99.99% of people of Azad Kashmir assert that their merger with Pakistan was a good step. However, there is a small minority of self-interested parasites who seek to fragment the freedom movement for their own personal material, economic and political gains by claiming stake in the control of an autonomous Kashmiri state that will never exist (as it is legally the territory and its population are the citizens of Pakistan).  If such a state is created, there is no chance for its survival.


Tuesday, 12 March 2013

DR. AWATAR SINGH SEKHON FOREIGN AFFAIRS ADVISOR TO DAL KHALSA ALLIANCE (UNITED STATES) URGES THE UNITED NATION HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL TO SEND MS. YAKIN ERTURK, SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR TO INDIA WHERE MINORITIES ARE OVERWHELMINGLY TARGETS/VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN GENERAL AND SECURITY FORCES IN PARTICULAR HAVE BEEN USING RAPE AS A TOOL TO SUPPRESS THE VOICE FOR FREEDOM IN KHALISTAN AND KASHMIR

DR. AWATAR SINGH SEKHON FOREIGN AFFAIRS ADVISOR TO DAL KHALSA ALLIANCE (UNITED STATES) URGES THE UNITED NATION HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL TO SEND MS. YAKIN ERTURK, SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR TO INDIA WHERE MINORITIES ARE OVERWHELMINGLY TARGETS/VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN GENERAL AND  SECURITY FORCES IN PARTICULAR HAVE BEEN USING RAPE AS A TOOL TO SUPPRESS THE VOICE FOR FREEDOM IN KHALISTAN AND KASHMIR


22nd Session of the Human Rights Council
CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND PEACE ADVOCACY
Read by: AWATAR SINGH SEKHON
GENERAL DEBATE: AGENDA NO. 3  

Mr. President ;My organization is here to address the plight of women and girls especially belonging to minorities who are constant victims of psychological and physical violence. It is disappointing that despite the unprecedented violence experienced by the women in India, the international human rights organizations and their respective administrations, the civil society have failed to persuade the government to eliminate divisions, and take punitive action against perpetrators of crimes committed against women and girls of the minorities.

Mr. President ;Women and girls are more vulnerable than ever before. It is a horrible reality that incidents of rape have increased.  The largest democracy of the world has failed to deal effectively for the crimes against women.

The security forces have been playing their active role to suppress the freedom struggle which is legitimate and well recognized by the United Nations. Women being the direct victims of the physical violence, rape, abduction, murder and indirect victims of arrest, torture, disappearance, displacement and this translate into loss of loved ones. A study done by Medecins Sans Frontier’s in the mid 2005 revealed that minorities' women are the prime object of the sexual violence in the world, included are the Sikh women of the decade of 1980s and 1990s. Nearly 9000 cases of all ages have become victims of massive and brutal gang rapes and molestation.

My organization appeals to the Council to press India to end all forms of violence against the female sex in the larges democracy, so to speak. My organization also urges the Council to send Ms. Yakin Erturk, United Nations Special Rapporteur on violence against women, to visit India to get the first hand information of the matter in question.

I thank you, President. 

Monday, 11 March 2013

OMAR’S TEARS AND POLITICS BY DR.ABDUL MAJID SIRAJ

OMAR’S TEARS AND POLITICS BY DR.ABDUL MAJID SIRAJ

   
India is no doubt the largest democracy on Earth and by its own definition democracy integrates opinion of a system of government by the whole population. The National Conference leaders like Dr Mustafa Kamal and Omar Abdulla are making news by asserting their right to be a part of that whole population. National Conference proclaim as a policy that Jammu & Kashmir has been given an adversarial treatment by the Indian government time and over and  no progress made in implementation of legally mandated pledges given to the State. Logic of cause and effect would leave unscathed voices and tears well up in frustration. NC responsible for seminal politics in Kashmir carried the mantle of restoring the historical title through right to self-determination.They used Indian foreign policy decree of a plebiscite and fought elections on the back of that manifesto. They were rebuffed and their leaders banished to exile.  

National Conference’s current platform on autonomy spawned from the letter that Abdullah wrote to Mrs Indira Gandhi Prime Minister of India on Feb. 11, 1975 in which Abdullah reiterated that the constitutional relationship between India and J&K should be what it was in 1953. This paved a legitimate pathway for a democratic demand that could not be construed as blames worthy or anti-Indian or an act of sedition. 1953 Agreement for NC ossified A-370 vehicle in the wedlock between India and Kashmir. 370 was not only a statute in Indian constitution but also unshakable because of its endorsement by J&K constitution (1975) that made no provisions for its dilution or removal when confirming accession.This posture in India Kashmir relationship encouraged further parlays by NC leaders to press for removal of Armed Forces Special Powers Act and withdrawal of armed forces from Jammu and Kashmir. The current NC leader in power Omar Abdullah also voiced these demands from an official platform. It may be Dr Mustafa’s conception of an egalitarian and tolerant form of society has been his misfortune that repeatedly lands him in the battle of harsh critique but from his rebellious disclosures he underscores the axiom that a democracy in real terms cannot exist if it is not run on veracity in democratic principles.

National Conference is synonymous with the life history of Sheikh Mohammad Abdulla. In 1931, in an all-out revolt against autocracy he rose to reform governance of a brutalised society and assertion of democratic right in a totalitarian harsh regime. His journey was momentous, full of hazards, trials and tribulations and encounters with fierce resistance from the ruler. He came through as a strong and prodigious leader, known the world over. Mustafa lives in his father and derives guidance from his teachings.It is Abdulla’s Rambir Singh Pora speech on April 10, 1952 that crystallized for him a clear stand.India was communal Abdulla had said and Kashmir was wedded to secularism.  The two ideologies stood symbolic of anti-thesis.Soon after that the working group of NC top leaders had met and decided on supporting a plebiscite to include choice for independence for the whole State, with joint control of defence and foreign Affairs from India and Pakistan. Sheikh Abdullah declared on July 13, 1953 that Jammu & Kashmir can be independent and is not an appendage of India or Pakistan. In a dovetail development NC General Secretary Moulana Syed Masoodi warned India of a demand for third option if pressure for a total merger with India was allowed to mount. It is the intensity of such landmarks in the genesis of NC party that brings tears and impels them to say that if autonomy was not conceded, India may have to give independence.

NC has been a drone with its controls in New Delhi. Sheikh Abdullah made an all-out effort to pilot the governance of the State and spent 20 years in jail.His son Dr Farooq re-invigorated an autonomy drive and tried to resist the drone culture and met his fate by being unseated from power by using associates close to him.The grandson Omar has a grooming in the wider Indian constituency and he made his efforts at withdrawal of draconian laws and withdrawal of army from the State.He was disappointed and as reported by Early Times Jammu (March I, 2013) the response he got was deployment of more troops on LOC and IB. That would inevitably increase tension and more harsh treatment for the masses.What else would he expect except tears?  I take exception with people who say that he must resign if he finds himself ineffectual.   What would be the aftermath sequel following his resignation? Would India then concede to demands; current or past?  It was apparent to him that while screaming for redress of massive criminal violations against people in the State one more young man Tahir Ahmad was killed in cold blood. ‘We had to cross so many rivers of fire and blood’ written in memoirs of Sheikh Abdulla remind him of where history has landed the nation.       

A critique on the genesis of catastrophic conflict that is devastating the subcontinent is valid and NC has a widely held share to bear.Related views are expressed in the recent publication of the book ‘The Unwritten History’ by Chrsitopher Snedden who claimed that if all 77% Muslims in 1947 were united, and then the Maharaja would have found it difficult to accede the whole State of J&K to India. This has an oblique reference to the role National Conference played at the crucial juncture in the history of Kashmir.   NC functionaries like MP Gulam Nabi Ratanpuri who pledged support for restoration of people’s democratic rights and claim openly that self-determination is a legal right that must be accorded to the population made observations on the role of their seminal leadership with flaws and failures (GK March 1).       

NC member Dr Mahboob Beg tried his hand at petitioning before Home Minister Mr Shinde for bare minimum considerations towards Kashmir and return of the dead body of Kashmiris buried in Tihar jail. This was a plea that Omar as CM had openly made. In a critical analysis a contrast is made with the powers of Mr. Narinder Modi the Chief Minister of Gujarat, who is openly dictating the terms to powers in centre and runs his state like his country. Kashmir is subservient and Omar may posture as being in command but makes it known that there are immense structural obstacles that define his state, a statement made by Tanvir Sadiq his political secretary (GK 9 march, 13).His tears will remain his mate with each tumble the political upheavals take and Kashmir surges on suffering unabated.

DR Abdul Majid Siraj    nova.academia89@gmail.com  www.kashmir-caselaw.com