UK MPS PREPARE FOR HISTORIC DEBATE IN
THE UK PARLIAMENT ON THE ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN BRAHMIN HINDU INDIA:
DR.AWATAR SINGH SEKHON , FOREIGN AFFAIRS ADVISER, DAL KHALSA ALLIANCE (UNITED
STATED)
The 'breed' of politicians (elected by the British Sikhs and other British
electorates) are very peculiar. The Sikh electorates should not think that
'they are electing a British citizen to responsible to the affairs of his/her
country and 'not' only for the Sikh affairs only. Indeed, carrying out a lobby
for a specific purpose is their right that has been granted to them under the
'Democratic Rights' granted under the Constitution of the British parliament.
It is quite understandable that the British Sikh citizens would like convey to
their elected representative(s) to convey/ask to another country as to the
concerns of their one segment of the British citizens. And under their rights,
they will do to convey as to what they feel about for which they have been
asked to communicate. These elected representatives can go to a certain areas.
The British Sikhs have to realize it as to what extent their elected
representatives may go.
On the other hand, the British Sikh brothers and sisters should not forget or overlook the instruction of their 10th Master, Sahib Guru Gobind Singh ji. Guru Sahib had said: "Koi kiss ko Raj Na De hai Jo bhi le hai pane Nij Bal se le hai." If my brothers and sisters believe in the teachings of the 10th Master, it is amply clear how far they can go in the religious and political matters. In the Sikh religion, both religion and politics to concurrently. In Guru Sahib's teachings, it is amply clear what is the powerr of being a 'Sovereign nation and Sovereign entity'. It must not be forgotten that the"Sikhs had been the First Sovereign Nation of South Asia, as the Sikh history taughts us." Being a British citizen or citizen of any other country. In the Brahmins-Hindus-turbaned Brahmins Rats' demoncracy alias Indian demoncracy, the Sikhs and non-Brahmins-Hindus minorities have no democratic rights in reality of the subject under discussion and consideration.
Further, "Kalistan Zindabad", within the four walls of an institution has no meaning unless the voice is taken outside. Does this voice has any meaning where the people like Manmohan Sinh Kohli, Hanera (Prakash) Sinh Badal, the Badal clan, the Badal Akalis (Kaalis) and likewise are in the control of political power and do these people know that the Sikhs' representatives had not signed/accepted/endorsed the Indian Constitution 1950? Do they know that the Hon. Justice (Mr) A Qadri of the Gujarat State High Court had said that "The Article 14A was rendered ineffective during the Genocide of Muslims of Gujarat, the State administered by Narender Modi of the BJP in 2002-2003, and at the New Delhi administration headed by a criminal Prime Minister AB Vajpayee, and his colleagues like LK Advani, Shushma Swaraj and Akalis of the Badal Akali Dal (Bad+Dal) Private Limited, Incorporation."
On the other hand, the British Sikh brothers and sisters should not forget or overlook the instruction of their 10th Master, Sahib Guru Gobind Singh ji. Guru Sahib had said: "Koi kiss ko Raj Na De hai Jo bhi le hai pane Nij Bal se le hai." If my brothers and sisters believe in the teachings of the 10th Master, it is amply clear how far they can go in the religious and political matters. In the Sikh religion, both religion and politics to concurrently. In Guru Sahib's teachings, it is amply clear what is the powerr of being a 'Sovereign nation and Sovereign entity'. It must not be forgotten that the"Sikhs had been the First Sovereign Nation of South Asia, as the Sikh history taughts us." Being a British citizen or citizen of any other country. In the Brahmins-Hindus-turbaned Brahmins Rats' demoncracy alias Indian demoncracy, the Sikhs and non-Brahmins-Hindus minorities have no democratic rights in reality of the subject under discussion and consideration.
Further, "Kalistan Zindabad", within the four walls of an institution has no meaning unless the voice is taken outside. Does this voice has any meaning where the people like Manmohan Sinh Kohli, Hanera (Prakash) Sinh Badal, the Badal clan, the Badal Akalis (Kaalis) and likewise are in the control of political power and do these people know that the Sikhs' representatives had not signed/accepted/endorsed the Indian Constitution 1950? Do they know that the Hon. Justice (Mr) A Qadri of the Gujarat State High Court had said that "The Article 14A was rendered ineffective during the Genocide of Muslims of Gujarat, the State administered by Narender Modi of the BJP in 2002-2003, and at the New Delhi administration headed by a criminal Prime Minister AB Vajpayee, and his colleagues like LK Advani, Shushma Swaraj and Akalis of the Badal Akali Dal (Bad+Dal) Private Limited, Incorporation."
It is my personal beliefs that when
you have murderous, criminal, unethical, morally mentally bankrupt (elected)
politicians The Economist 1995, July 15, p. 26), can you expect any thing good
to be done under the regime? I would doubt it.
