Thursday 25 April 2013

THE SIKH HOMELAND OF PUNJAB (KHALISTAN) OF AUGUST 15, 1947 IS THE SOVEREIGN STATE OF THE SIKHS AND THEY MUST RECEIVE IT


THE SIKH HOMELAND OF PUNJAB (KHALISTAN) OF AUGUST 15, 1947 IS THE SOVEREIGN STATE OF THE SIKHS AND THEY MUST RECEIVE IT


Dr. Awatar Singh Sekhon whom I know personally moved to Canada when there was no concept of asylum and visitor/immigrant visas were being granted at the point of entry. He strove hard and achieved a high degree of education receiving his doctorate and assumed various designations/positions of prestige.  

Just as Muslims in Maqbooza Kashmir have been oppressed for decades now, the Sikhs also face the same plight. Under the Indian Constitution Article no. 25, Sikhs are homogenized under the Hindu religion; Sikhism is not even a recognized religion in India. As far as Master Tara Singh (a converted Sikh born in a Hindu Khatri family) is concerned, he was still loyal to the Hindu cause when he burnt the Muslim league flag in Lahore on March 14, 1947. This action was done in order to give out two messages to the British. First, that the Sikhs don’t want a separate state and secondly, to create a rift between Sikhs and Muslims. Islam does not allow one to stay angry with another for more than three days. As such there is no enmity or anger between the Muslim nation and any other nation, especially the Sikhs.  

Aurangzeb Alamgir (ramatullah elaha) the emperor of Hindustan knew that theTenth Master Janab Guru Gobind Sahib was a noble man but he was never able to meet him. Although he wanted to visit the Tenth Master, he had died. However, his son Bahadur Shah treated him very well even providing him with medical care when the Tenth Master was injured.

When Hindus who have never ruled a unified India are eligible to receive freedom and their own sovereign state; why not the Sikhs? Therefore I strongly demand that the Sikhs be given the freedom to practice their religion in their own sovereign state.  

Regards,

Habib Yousafzai
 

4 comments:

  1. Thank you, Habib Yousafza ji

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aurangzeb recognized Guru Gobind Sahib was a noble man, you guys are such a lairs. Sikhism was formed to save hindus from muslim atrocities. aurangzeb was a killer of thousand of hindus and sikhs. dont forget your ancestors were also hindus

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where it is written that "Sikhism was formed to save Hindus from Muslim atrocities"? Is their any source of Sikh Bhagats writing this or is this Hindu conspired statement?

      If Khalsa army saved someone from clutches of wrong doer then why you see it as "Hindu saved from Muslim".

      With this analogy, Diwan Sucha Nand is conspirator of punishment of Gur Gobind Singh younger sons then should we say Hindu killed sons of Gur Gobind Singh?

      When Diwan Chandu, a Hindu did his best to kill Gur Arjan then should we say Hindu killed some Sikh Bhagat?

      If no then don't give rubbish statements. If yes then accept this fact that due to hindu we lose our primary persons. I can give many examples where Sikhs had heavy lose due to Hindus only.

      Do you know what is HINDU? From where this word came? Those people who don't know name of their religion are commenting about others.

      I am not supporter of Khalistan, another land where a turbany politician come to rule other Sikhs. We are against all borders.

      Though Land ruler must be just whether he is Hindu or Moslem or Christian or Buddhist or any other. Ruler must accept truth and walk on truth.

      Delete
  3. Nice written, but having independent state is not solution for Sikhs in any way.

    Sikhs are very far from their philosophy. They have turbans beard and blind love to Human Gurus/Bhagtas that they even believe wrong aspects/stories/philosophies which were attached later to their Gurus by intruders.

    For finding this Hindu intrusion in Sikhism, Sikhs need to have deep understanding of their scripture. But they study their scriptures with HINDUS made dictionaries. Though their Granth is itself dictionary(Kunji) of its own. and understanding is not only important main is to follow or walk on that.

    Just by Saying SAT SRI AKAAL does not mean that he believes Akaal. First Sikh do not know what is Akaal and What is Satt he just speaks. So devoid of knowledge if get rule then it will be same like Maharaja ranjit singh,

    "Gurdwaron me moortiyan aa gayi thee iske raaj me, aur moorti pooja to sikhi me shirk hai"

    ReplyDelete